Nearly three-quarters of Brits think that flying a drone should require an airborne equivalent of the driving licence. The study, commissioned by UK tech firm Nominet, also found that 17% of the British public think drones shouldn’t be sold to the general public at all. More than 2,000 British adults – including 500 drone owners – were surveyed by Opinium, revealing that everyday Brits are very worried about the growing use of drones. The vast majority of people who responded to the survey supported a crackdown on drones, with 92% saying there should be restrictions on who can own one. This included restricting ownership for people with criminal records, poor eyesight, and anyone who lives in a built-up area. There was also lots of support for a central drone database, with 37% of those surveyed saying that the Government should set up a body to manage drone ownership – and possible licensing. Nominet’s Russell Haworth said: “What’s needed is a centralised database and flight path mapping tools that allows these drones to communicate with each other.” “That way, accidents are less likely to happen, as collision avoidance systems would take over in the event of an emergency.” The study revealed dangerous trends among drone owners too, with more than a quarter admitting they didn’t know the maximum range of their device. Over half of the drone owners surveyed also revealed that they had crashed their drone. And two-thirds of drone enthusiasts said they had filmed a person or place without permission. The UK government is currently working on a draft Drone Bill that will introduce sweeping laws that affect how you can use drones. The bill, which is due to be published in spring, will give police wider powers, including the ability to have drones grounded. The National Police Chiefs’ Serena Kennedy said: “We are working with all relevant partners to understand the threats that this new technology can pose when used irresponsibly or illegally.”
“Do not take this lightly – if you use a drone to invade people’s privacy or engage in disruptive behaviour, you could face serious criminal charges.” The bill is expected to force drone owners to sit safety awareness tests, and lead to a central registration database for anyone who has a drone that weighs more than 250 grams. But Nominet’s Haworth says that if the Government can tackle the dodgy side of drones, there’s a great opportunity to improve life for everyone. “At the moment, drones are largely extravagant toys, but the reality is that they have the potential to revolutionise many aspects of our lives.” “For example, they could speed up deliveries and provide the emergency services with a fast way to check the safety of a situation remotely.” “The speed and versatility of drones means they can be deployed with ease, and many are small enough to be unobtrusive.” The Sun also spoke to Christian Struwe, who heads up European Public Policy at drone-maker giant DJI. Struwe said: “As with any emerging technology, we understand that there is still education to be done on the safe use of drones – not least to pilots.” “That is why DJI introduced its knowledge quiz in the UK before Christmas, guiding drone pilots through applicable rules and regulations, and supporting the Government on developing new rules.” “At the same time, we are seeing drones already being used for a plethora of good purposes, from search-and-rescue, education, and film-making.” Tim Johnson, Policy Director at the Civil Aviation Authority, said: “Drones can bring economic and workplace safety benefits, but to achieve those we need everyone flying a drone now to do so safely. Powered by WPeMatico The post Driving licence for DRONES supported by majority of Brits, while 1 in 5 call for total ban appeared first on PC Store Near Me. via Technology Latest News – PC Store Near Me http://ift.tt/2DShWFB
Comments
���rG�����e�[�@�D9d�n�[j�[�z�x�E�@@*� @��1���s^n����+�� R`[��[ UY��.����g�}v��o�?z��� F�I����+��h�ೀ��/Ƌ$~��oO��q?x8���l��t��N�8���Ez:�f�xT��8x�O����v��$^D��U�����a�(�.����b����uXZ�o�˽�?��Y�8.��n�O�J?�^��a�(�̢Ř��z��a<8�7�F��$4�B���`1:?�؏r0���(�d�(��r������"�Nj�i���h6K��$=�u�T8Q1D3�}�CP֟�g�`:���y:�KA���I�V���Z�fY:�����G��d�� N��Y4�*�Q2��N�Y_�k��[��Z��;Xa!�=c�’��et���roM��s�m4�j����`�w���^Y��4�;�&�����L�ܓ�”���~�姟sw�{/�t����O�E:��ߧ��Z�_��r�`u��f�+���םM�oV����q��@��j��W��/q��b���w�-�9��Y�U�������}Γ�e,�Ef�����ɾ�3�S*��JH4w)���F.*Ġ�;oYa�_~q?t���� ��)��t��+k��5����r�f�եw�)�]�-�h�C������w�B��ld!;����9yr��`)���}�M= L�!3#GH4�(�ޙ”�J�g��R{s��0gR��W����w��,�k�7�����0[r�o��W#�����c�^1}�-���a�՛�:�f��Bե;�N��|��_���wq��w��r�����l���I�w���5���ى �Y�,#|�A��r�y�&����~*��(y�]�ƹ5UJ�dx�dxK��K��oD�PɈJ?��ާ�}�e~�71S?�r��&�$�����T��9iVsE,y’+�Jbb+ܪxdqI�Fv����T_�xUg��kw[ݦ��{��idD�.S%==���R�K�x�N}�Ԁ�����J%�M��R>�_Ku���z�B!����2�lq��I�w_�.&�w`���3��Ξ�X��*�.����K�R [�=���g/��ieXE�a��ᗫ��W_~�~y79���{/��”�r�?�2�r�j���^D�?r͞r2|_��$��/�C� “�I�r��_:�}Y.̬��o�?�������eQs�����B1:�xZyL�[t��d۪E�? �6��K���iG�s���n[Co������P��Ì�lIKdҼ��qP��k �%��xI��mv��E�i��0[���oX��ɵr�����ۆ�Z�”ڵ�xq{�� S�[��1��zfmA%��C+ӑ�ػff>`��ky�^���ٌ�KCuԇ�On�zQ� ��1�!��!����s������^z��.W����Ct�(�>��_/�?��?8˰nf������=//.���%M9�� ?Ͳ ��ݍ��0�ÓӬ9[�9_��Q�K�lG�O��Z���I���;����%�c��w’9}eU` �8�m��/�KS��,��h_+�p�E�ɸ~ѭG�&�IL�ŝ*��d��Q����Ĭ�S5���=��u/9&�p�&�%�A� �� @>��e�;N�z��”��CLq$�L�K�Rf��DO�ʽ �cI$����(ZVB�l֡SO��v��j��6�Hk&o�� ��XH��g”��g�#��� b�eM��k�Ў����=��’V��Ŋ�Xȗ�2�7���?� ����o��G�+��%����f(�}�#D� 8�r�F���έŭ�oCԭC�W��ǣ���[�}%����?���t�0��BF���Q��Q4�H��4������[۪eQ�ޒ�z��!�[��|Jt��5�k�ܣ�p`�$�h����6�r=v{m��l{�uy=2(�_႐��j镊�^�p�^��l�L���x�uN����u ���vk�~�ŮCH�”�*M�ֽ&�#��!4v{u�#���F�V�m �_�.5c&oT�����Q�h “‘��7�6n�a���:s�[�J��YQq��c3-����"���ߤ� �9ȳ�+1(���H u�,��#t�|����ɑ��I�p�M����m�Io�c�>�˷�n�.��} �8aKS��Eȸ�aNd����K����|� �|���ѕ�SInO��/폪’w��q�A�v����qO��7:�}��u�f��l5k1��:�xu������}�v]�;�m��Y���%�Qk�y�@Χ���_Ο�ٟ�a ��f�7q�Y�Ⱥe�m�.Mo0cm��x�Zd#���CeU�.�-y�ǡ���1O$_�”��B�C��?��ݮ/o��lG��SR�8�k���q���J�L��㔧j�u?<9��ik¶��+��m�Z�Zs�}L�lj������}�.���h99I�����O'�?��OG��,:�ͪ�4-�;��떕eW�Ì-������:��t� ��eUes��춺_��_�r����[��Ԣ�q��W�.��x���r�5�/�� ���nq��w�������v�������ݙ�� �t�ZX��7�n�Z��~�x�m�l�k��z������o{����n��^/yx+�’��’x�/�y�|`������6������+6�=�E��i�K���*�#á�r�5�A�n�i7��*?xȶ�8��K&��gT/�� tV�o�6�N-L�7�s�v��ڄ� 5�o�K�s� agy��oz�1d��`��| ���}Ls�-1��G�tW�^� �p��^?9�Z6V_�����&z��L��’��[��q�YO�g��b���3)J�I�yx�Qy�y�xG����ð�_��Q���V��6��aܮt�Q�ua��T�ݫ�J���)��x�ρ�-�v垫��˰��F^����6k�����@XCD���� ��q��$6�o��Y�yn�~��4u�=�P����1����Fg#R�Rg�U�V�Sg�Lf��a ^4�ΎLk��;�z�R��٘�X��������f��jR�H�����I�(6�gg���3��ȷ�8�N2�@^��6f�D���$P��$}sX�ՂZ���vL)��I.V��մ�S��Txu�y���OYE��̆��� ������=mv{�0h���V���X���j���F�ڮ��j�����J�Qma�����w’�U��jC�z�f�4dwT��W��UC��K��F:isЬ4��Q�[�K4� ֒[��y5�/�U�j�,�]�4HKSmT�:ۨ��ޭԻ/�X��?ܧM@w���9�s`}v4�L�2W[ӳ�٦�:�Mη@ u]��vRi5����X�M&(���Š�eS@~7h�}�ϰ�N��e��O�+��?����7�gw��v���n���fw���p�^������ܐa�^������z�6��6�Rx�.ia���h��I���C�C5Rn�ut���Q��1l�u�]X$h6���!���ݬ���#�C�Em�@��H�����M�ڻ��mz|t�y?=� ��V�B��/�V��Y-Ymd����wZ���ٶ�F�J�IwX]|�9��2lh�j�����Y�MEY��R�;O�=������s6zj���S���q�NX�’�N�C���#��q:��=FhЊ%��!�H����w�’�����F����%�죩���v�;ba���jo�ǵxy�B��4�:E�B�ݒ�H�v[R��j”b���k�9�K�*]��^��S ��V�6��n�Rm&@v~�p�*�V�O�f� ca��A�q��hU (S �|tڭj��}�AjC�� ��j7�1kx��j��#��e^MG]��O�a���.o.`&ݮ�FR�5�.�� p�D75P0��C�4$��RG������%ucW�i��’�kg�c�v�j’p3��:i=Ҙ��ڸ�/�[�IH�% C�-�P�S�l����j��d���լP���� ��Y�5�^@�nc�K/0��kUm��`�m�Q��:�G���0j���m���B�����hK�e���ީ��96{���ZIQG����s�e�ʈh��HҧS?s�ԤvY�F�f-�t�_�˚�^�[b֫�{��lf’QW�t��^�_]H�j��Zm!���� Pgǣ �ӗ�D��L��Ѫ5�I�㪭Z� �#�]3���e�0� َG t~7�Ï-فib�f ���D��@f7UN7:Bo���_�kg�c�&(��YbM�f�L_�GH�v�����b�L܁r@3r����݂������������UmԐ!�6�J�ٳ���|61���Հ��c��x�E�t��J�n�i�.hk-1Z�ޚ�wR�F�4:ڮ!ǀ���{�^�[�B��j?%”P���#Nwk�#T�-t�C�’�)6Zg!�C/mD(�M0U������6`e��m싐��b�v��:-,����&s Q���e~� �q� ĸH�>�>vj�M��`X,�?u�!’�)A�Wy�7��X��f�D�3a.u��g���u-��|�s 8�1�� �l+/��~_�8��:��YA� Ň�ҁ,����Gp-jK[�>�a,H�7�01+�(G��3��v�_�Wa�*$A�T��-?��H�1J� 28nI�Nt��*Nm�b�9�3�t��$��*�s��|c��Q]���3�T����X�������E0�B�J�@ �z@�8@$�*֎,A����g ��D^a�ț#�@^�C1�#.&2�1������h�%�W�QX^>�4KT�q++y��ve��N.�6꼂�q��oGH���?��2;m��[�6ۄ��R&%4�=�I@����ԋ`�Z]�I�!��(i��]��]] ���$�Q’�t�J��C!��p�`��)�o����)���H교�����F�ݔ�X/��u��uwP���:��O����gCcB����X��t?��4j�E{Y’2ڨ ^���Vp-^]q-�w�܁��}���n������`�uo�H�}�ڃMd���3i�grcX��0�b�hݣhr���g~��L� >K3*��������e��LAdv�J2i��t�Q����p�CQOԈ���_�L5�o��ƨL�Y��2V�ú����MS�&�`�M.؏��J`����r��t���;��{��;��{�v��:�GY(������@�g���������66L�)��fW-��la΅}�*x�Пp�X�’K���3�U���|e����Wha (��������Wĕ�8�͘Ї�Y`��)v �� �r��p8s���g5�B��v~8ʽN�γ���hhJ%6���7fvP�0��p�H`98 ����D�w҃j�U Powered by WPeMatico The post DJI Mavic Air review: portable photographer appeared first on PC Store Near Me. via Technology Latest News – PC Store Near Me http://ift.tt/2EtmJ1d The only thing growing faster than the global drone population is the population of people thinking “how can I knock these annoying things out of the sky?” DroneShield offers a way to do just that, and now in a much more portable package, with the DroneGun Tactical — that is, if you’re an authorized government agent, which I doubt. Over the last few years, the Australian company DroneShield has been showing off its DroneGun, essentially a high-powered antenna that blasts drones’ own antennas with a signal powerful enough that it drowns out the controller’s instructions. Many drones in such a situation treat this like a loss of signal, and attempt to make a safe landing or, if GPS isn’t also scrambled, return to a known location. The problem with the DroneGun is that it’s really big, requiring a backpack with the batteries and other components in addition to the rifle-like gun itself. The DroneGun Tactical, on the other hand, is merely large. It’s 56 inches long, 18 inches tall and 8 inches wide, weighing more than 30 pounds. But no pack! I’m aware the pictures shown here are renders, but upon asking I was assured the device is in production. They already made the original, so I don’t doubt it. DroneShield claims that the Tactical will drop drones more than a kilometer away (about half the distance of the original), though you’ll need to maintain line of sight; if the drone reestablishes signal with its controller, it might just take off again. You should get an hour or two of straight jamming, more than enough to take down a dozen UAVs. A GPS blocker add-on is also available, which makes it all the more sure that the rogue craft will simply descend instead of flying home. I can certainly think of a few recent situations where I would have liked to bring an irresponsibly piloted drone down safely to give it a good stomp. But unfortunately ordinary folks like myself are strictly prohibited from getting their hands on one of these things. The FCC hasn’t approved the device for use in the U.S., meaning it’s illegal to operate one unless you’re an authorized agent of the government; for example, someone testing it for the military. (The Tactical, in fact, was developed “following comprehensive international military end-user trials.”) When I asked DroneShield’s CEO if these devices were likely to ever get FCC approval, he simply responded “no.” Well, at least he’s honest. You can learn more over at the company’s site. Featured Image: DroneShield Powered by WPeMatico The post DroneGun Tactical is a portable (but still illegal) drone scrambler appeared first on PC Store Near Me. via Technology Latest News – PC Store Near Me http://ift.tt/2DO3w9j Anzeige</<span> Der chinesische Computerhersteller Lenovo wird demnächst ein neues 2-in-1 auf den Markt bringen, das Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 330 heißt und mit neuen Intel Prozessoren der Gemini Lake Architektur ausgestattet ist. Offiziell hat Lenovo das Convertible noch nicht vorgestellt, doch konnte WinFuture zahlreiche Bilder und genaue Spezifikationen auftreiben. Den Informationen zufolge dürfte das Yoga 330 ein recht preiswertes 2-in-1 werden. Wie alle Geräte der Yoga-Serie, hat auch das Lenovo Yoga 330 ein um 360 Grad drehbares Display. Dadurch kann das Notebook in ein Tablet verwandelt werden. Beim Design gibt es im Vergleich zu den Vorgängern also keine großen Unterschiede. Das Gehäuse dürfte größtenteils aus Kunststoff bestehen. Durchaus spannend ist das 11,6 Zoll große Display des Yoga 330. Dieses bietet zwar nur eine Auflösung von 1366 x 768 Pixel, doch soll die Oberfläche matt sein. Für Touchscreen-Geräte ist das ziemlich selten. Sofern das Display laminiert ist, könnte es im Vergleich zu fast allen Konkurrenten also deutlich weniger spiegeln. Einen aktiven Stift wird es anscheinend nicht unterstützen. Lenovo Yoga 330 Datenblatt
Lenovo wird das Convertible anscheinend mit zwei verschiedenen Prozessoren anbieten. Im preiswerteren soll ein Intel Celeron N4000 SoC sitzen. Das ist ein Dual-Core Chip, der mit 1,1GHz bis 2,6GHz taktet. Teurer wird sicherlich das Modell mit einem Intel Pentium Silver N5000. Das ist ein neuer Quad-Core Prozessor, dessen vier Kerne ebenfalls mit 1,1GHz laufen, im Turbo-Boost aber auf bis zu 2,7GHz hochtakten können. Zusätzlich soll es je nach Ausführung 2GB, 4GB oder 8GB Arbeitsspeicher geben. Beim internen eMMC Flash-Speicher hat man die Wahl zwischen 32GB, 64GB und 128GB. Optional soll man das Yoga 330 auch mit einer 256GB SSD bekommen können. Unklar ist, ob auch die eMMC-Modelle einen SATA-Slot besitzen und man sie somit selbst mit einer SSD aufrüsten kann. Ich habe bisher weder den Intel N5000, noch den N4000 getestet. Doch die Performance der Vorgänger (N3350, N3450, N4200) sind in der Regel für Office-Arbeiten ausreichend. Mit dem Top-Modell mit 8GB RAM und der 256GB SSD müssten auch leichte Arbeiten in Photoshop einigermaßen flüssig möglich sein. Weniger Anspruchsvolle Videobearbeitungsprogramme wie Cyberlinks PowerDirector arbeiten mit den Chips oft auch überraschend gut. Adobe Premiere Pro kann man aber vergessen. Es gibt einen USB Typ C Anschluss, einen normalen USB 3.0 Port, einen USB 2.0 Anschluss und einen HDMI-Ausgang. Schön ist außerdem, dass ein Kartenslot für eine normalgroße SD-Karte verbaut ist. Viele Konkurrenten setzten mittlerweile nur noch auf microSD-Karten. Neben AC-WLAN wird auch Bluetooth 4.2 unterstützt. Die Webcam bietet eine magere VGA-Auflösung. Wie gesagt, das Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 330 ist noch nicht offiziell und wir kennen noch keine Preise. Vermutlich wird Lenovo das Convertible Ende Februar auf dem Mobile World Congress in Barcelona zeigen. Dort haben sie die letzten Jahre öfters preiswerte 2-in-1 präsentiert.
Powered by WPeMatico The post Lenovo Yoga 330: Günstiges 2-in-1 mit Intel Gemini Lake SoC gesichtet appeared first on PC Store Near Me. via Technology Latest News – PC Store Near Me http://ift.tt/2Ep8iex As I mentioned in my recent review of the Nova WiFi System, I’ve been long on the hunt for a mesh WiFi system. To that end, I’ve been testing the Milo System from ParkerVision. Milo is available in two- ($129) and three-packs ($189) from Amazon and Walmart. I had high hopes for Milo going into the review. It doesn’t meet them all and has a couple of glaring issues but it does work. DESIGNI’m not a huge fan of the way that Milo looks. It’s sort of a pinched cylinder, about 7.5 inches tall and 4 inches wide. The units are all white plastic with a turquoise Milo logo screened on the front. They aren’t terribly ugly, but I’d prefer them to be a little more inconspicuous. As is, I feel a little better having these tucked away out of sight than out in the open. One of the units functions as the base unit and is equipped with an ethernet port. All are powered by cell-phone like power bricks and microUSB cables. The back of each unit is vented to keep it all nice and cool. This slideshow requires JavaScript. There are three tiny LEDs on the front of the unit that indicate network status – green for good, amber for poor, and blinking for disconnected. As far as I can tell there is no way to disable the lights. That could be a bit annoying in a darkened room. SETUPParkerVision claims that Milo’s setup is as easy as 1-2-3. It isn’t. The idea is that you can setup Milo a few different ways. One way is to connect it to your existing WiFi network and run the Milo network side-by-side with it. This results in adding an additional network for your devices to use and seems sort of pointless to me in most situations. The second, and probably most useful, option is to wirelessly connect the Milo to your existing WiFi network and extend it. The third option, and the one I chose, is to connect the Milo via cable to your existing router and use only the Milo nodes to provide wireless coverage. Your needs will dictate which option works best for you. Setup should be as simple as plugging in the three nodes and running through the setup steps. And it was that simple for me. But, getting it to work properly was much more difficult. It seemed that no matter what I tried I could not get one of the nodes recognized and added to the network. I reset all of the units multiple times. I moved them around to ensure that they were within operating distance of each other. None of it resulted in a working network at first. Eventually I just threw in the towel and moved on to something else and the third node “magically” connected at some point. Beyond choosing wired/wireless, 2-node or 3-node, and the network name there isn’t much configuration available. While that might be a relief to some, it does result in a limiting system. Want an all 5 Ghz network? Forget it. Want to use a certain IP range? Can’t do it. Any other configuration you might want? Nah. PERFORMANCEHere’s where things go off the rails for me. When I used the Nova system each node would broadcast a 5 Ghz and 2.4 Ghz signal. This allowed maximum flexibility and range for all of your devices. The way that Milo is defined, that doesn’t happen. In a 2-node system you’ll have one 5 Ghz signal and one 2.4 Ghz signal and there’s nothing you can do about it. In a 3-node system you’ll get two of one and one of the other, depending on how you connect it. This isn’t ideal and can lead to performance inconsistencies across your network.
Indeed, I never could get maximum performance in my internet speed tests. I have a 100 Mbps connection but couldn’t get more than 55 Mbps even on the 5 Ghz 802.11n connection. In general, speeds were good enough to support almost any common application though. They just weren’t optimal. Range was a bit of an issue, too. Whereas with the Nova system I could go outside my house and into the street and still get 30% performance I saw sub-megabit speeds. In the house things were fine, though. CONCLUSIONIt’s hard for me to recommend Milo when there are other similarly priced setups that have more options and are better performing. It’s not that it’s bad it’s just that, in comparison, it falls short. Maybe if it were $50 cheaper it would be easier to recommend. Share this:Powered by WPeMatico The post Milo Mesh WiFi Review – It Does Work, But… appeared first on PC Store Near Me. via Technology Latest News – PC Store Near Me http://ift.tt/2DQDrX8 |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2019
Categories |